MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381386301 · doi:10.1017/s1049023x23003953

“Is Resilience Useful, Usable, and Used? Outlining the Social Characteristics of a Resilient System”

2023· article· en· W4381386301 on OpenAlexaff
Olivia Bell, Christina J. Pickering, Neil Denton, Eve O'Connor, Kanza Ahmed, Frank Archer, Caroline Spencer, Louise J. Bracken, Virginia Murray

Bibliographic record

VenuePrehospital and Disaster Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Community resilienceUsabilitySocial capitalDisaster risk reductionKnowledge managementAsset (computer security)Risk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceProcess managementBusinessResource (disambiguation)SociologyEnvironmental resource managementComputer securityEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the international priority to systemically operationalise resilience in the face of increasing prevalence of complex and cascading hazards. This concept paper identifies the components of a resilient society, establishing the usefulness and usability of the application of ‘resilience’, and proposes the characteristics used by a resilient system. Method: Through the review of case-based examples and previously published concept papers, this paper underwent a concept analysis to understand and qualify the characteristics of a resilient community. Through extensive research and critical analysis of disaster risk responses both effective and not, the authors condensed the literature to identify the key components of a resilient society. Results: To respond to this evolving landscape of disaster risk, community and governmental responses should be collaborative in order to be successful and sustainable to increase resilience across communities, societies and networks. To unpick the complexity of how communities and governments might promote resilience effectively, we explore whether community and social capital are useful resources to create and sustain resilient approaches to disaster risk reduction and management. We consider that by exploring how social capital links, bridges and bonds actors within a system are qualitative key facets of a resilient community. A resilient system is the product of trust and collaboration between asset-based networks of bonded and bridged communities and risk and support-based networks of bonded and bridged organizations. Conclusion: By evaluating the usefulness and usability of the concept, we consider that a resilient system is an iterative learning process, asset based, trusting across power and resource gradients and is best built before or even if essential during a crisis. Noting that resilience is a dynamic process which requires integrated collaboration and continual adjustment to develop a sustainable framework, we consider that social characteristics of a resilient system are useful, useable and should be used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrehospital and Disaster MedicineSame topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207