MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Chance Constrained Stochastic Programming Model for Designing Two-tiered Emergency Medical Service Systems

2023· article· en· W4381387868 on OpenAlexaff
Sondes Hammami, Rania Boujemaa, Aïda Jebali, Ángel Ruiz, Hanen Bouchriha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFacility Location and Emergency Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicComputer scienceService (business)Stochastic programmingOperations researchProgramming paradigmLinear programmingMathematical optimizationDistributed computingEngineeringArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emergency Medical Services EMS must respond adequately within a predefined time to critical calls by providing first aid to patients and transporting them to health care centers if necessary. Herein, we will consider the EMS designing problem under demand uncertainty. A constrained stochastic programming model is developed to locate stations and define how many and which type of ambulances to affect to them. We linearized the probabilistic constraints to tackle the problem. To evaluate the impacts of proposed EMS configuration, we recourse to Mote Carlo simulation. The computational experiments are based on real data of a Tunisian Emergency Medical System.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFacility Location and Emergency ManagementFrench-language works237,207