Bibliographic record
Abstract
Set in a fictional Canadian suburb, this episodic novel centres on a group of characters of varying ages, social statuses, sexual orientations, and origins who are connected by relationships to each other and to their community. The lead protagonists of the novel are Violet Addams and Lucas Gibson, 20-something roommates, unwillingly sharing a townhouse. Lucas Gibson lives and works in the suburbs as a software engineer for a high technology firm. As the novel opens, Violet Addams, a recent university graduate, editor, and aspiring writer who finds herself at loose ends, moves to the suburbs to stay with her brother and his roommate, Lucas, and also to escape from the heartbreak of a failed relationship. Initially believing her circumstances to be temporary, Violet suddenly finds herself responsible for her brother's share of expenses when she discovers that he has fled his dissatisfying home life and complicated social life before she arrived. Violet and Lucas' time together begins. From this start, the narrative moves to stories about their immediate friends, relatives, and neighbours to create a portrait of the complex suburban experience. As time goes on, we see this group of characters evolve as we track their lives and loves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".