Large-scale data mining pipeline for identifying novel soybean genes involved in resistance against the soybean cyst nematode
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The soybean cyst nematode (SCN) [ Heterodera glycines Ichinohe] is a devastating pathogen of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] that is rapidly becoming a global economic issue. Two loci conferring SCN resistance have been identified in soybean, Rhg1 and Rhg4; however, they offer declining protection. Therefore, it is imperative that we identify additional mechanisms for SCN resistance. In this paper, we develop a bioinformatics pipeline to identify protein–protein interactions related to SCN resistance by data mining massive-scale datasets. The pipeline combines two leading sequence-based protein–protein interaction predictors, the Protein–protein Interaction Prediction Engine (PIPE), PIPE4, and Scoring PRotein INTeractions (SPRINT) to predict high-confidence interactomes. First, we predicted the top soy interacting protein partners of the Rhg1 and Rhg4 proteins. Both PIPE4 and SPRINT overlap in their predictions with 58 soybean interacting partners, 19 of which had GO terms related to defense. Beginning with the top predicted interactors of Rhg1 and Rhg4, we implement a “guilt by association” in silico proteome-wide approach to identify novel soybean genes that may be involved in SCN resistance. This pipeline identified 1,082 candidate genes whose local interactomes overlap significantly with the Rhg1 and Rhg4 interactomes. Using GO enrichment tools, we highlighted many important genes including five genes with GO terms related to response to the nematode (GO:0009624), namely, Glyma.18G029000 , Glyma.11G228300 , Glyma.08G120500 , Glyma.17G152300 , and Glyma.08G265700 . This study is the first of its kind to predict interacting partners of known resistance proteins Rhg1 and Rhg4, forming an analysis pipeline that enables researchers to focus their search on high-confidence targets to identify novel SCN resistance genes in soybean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".