MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381430262 · doi:10.1098/rsbm.2023.0007

John Herbert Beynon. 29 December 1923—24 August 2015

2023· article· en· W4381430262 on OpenAlexaff
Robert K. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueBiographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFullerene Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersSwansea UniversityUniversity of WarwickDirectorate for Biological SciencesPurdue University
KeywordsHonourCompendiumLibrary scienceWelshClassicsEngineeringOperations researchManagementChemistryArt historySociologyHistoryLawPolitical scienceComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract John Herbert Beynon was born in a Welsh mining village in 1923, graduated BSc (Hons, physics) at 19, then worked on weapons research for the war effort in World War Two. In 1947 he started a 22-year career at Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) in Manchester, where, with his technician Albert Williams, he revolutionized mass spectrometry from a physics method to an essential technique for organic chemistry. In 1960 he completed his landmark book Mass spectrometry and its applications to organic chemistry, which was reprinted by the American Society for Mass Spectrometry as a ‘Classic Book’. He continued his creative work in 1969–1974 at Purdue University. In 1974 he started his Royal Society Research Professorship at Swansea University, his alma mater. Collaborations here with a long string of students, postdoc, visiting professors and scientists from many countries resulted in about 65% of his list of 395 peer-reviewed publications. His unexpected retirement led to a compendium of 32 articles in his honour. He then initiated and edited a new journal, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1960.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal SocietySame topicFullerene Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207