MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2023· article· en· W4381433299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaLibrary scienceSession (web analytics)BeijingPolitical scienceWork (physics)EngineeringBusinessComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2023 International Conference on Chemical, Energy Science and Environmental Engineering (CESEE 2023) was held in Sanya, China during April 14-16, 2023. Considering travel restrictions, the conference was held in a hybrid format, including both on-site and cloud meetings. This was the first CESEE conference, intended to be repeated annually. This conference aimed to provide an attractive platform for academics, scientists, researchers, experts, entrepreneurs, and students to express and discuss their interests in chemical, energy and environmental engineering. The participants were from almost every part of the world, with various background such as academia, industry, and well-known entrepreneurs. More than 30 participants attended the conference online and offline, including China, Canada, Belgium, Argentina, Malaysia, Turkey, Uzbekistan and more. There were four renowned speakers who illustrated their latest research, to include Prof. Marc Rosen from Ontario Tech University, Canada; Prof. Jan Baeyens from the Beijing University of Chemical Technology, China and KU Leuven, Belgium; Prof. Nour Shafik El-Gendy from the Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Egypt; and Prof. Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah from University Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. The conference also had 2 technical sessions and 1 poster session. CESEE 2023 became an effective communication platform for all the participants who took the opportunity to share their research results and discuss potential scientific and engineering developments from their work. This contributed to the success of the conference. The conference proceedings are a compilation of the accepted papers and represent an interesting outcome of the conference. All papers in the proceedings have passed the vigorous review process involving reviewers by the international technical committee. The variety of research topics presented in the conference and novelty exhibited in the papers published in the proceedings demonstrated the impact of CESEE 2023. List of Committees are available in this pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5740.420

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207