MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2023· article· en· W4381433299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaLibrary scienceSession (web analytics)BeijingPolitical scienceWork (physics)EngineeringBusinessComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2023 International Conference on Chemical, Energy Science and Environmental Engineering (CESEE 2023) was held in Sanya, China during April 14-16, 2023. Considering travel restrictions, the conference was held in a hybrid format, including both on-site and cloud meetings. This was the first CESEE conference, intended to be repeated annually. This conference aimed to provide an attractive platform for academics, scientists, researchers, experts, entrepreneurs, and students to express and discuss their interests in chemical, energy and environmental engineering. The participants were from almost every part of the world, with various background such as academia, industry, and well-known entrepreneurs. More than 30 participants attended the conference online and offline, including China, Canada, Belgium, Argentina, Malaysia, Turkey, Uzbekistan and more. There were four renowned speakers who illustrated their latest research, to include Prof. Marc Rosen from Ontario Tech University, Canada; Prof. Jan Baeyens from the Beijing University of Chemical Technology, China and KU Leuven, Belgium; Prof. Nour Shafik El-Gendy from the Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Egypt; and Prof. Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah from University Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. The conference also had 2 technical sessions and 1 poster session. CESEE 2023 became an effective communication platform for all the participants who took the opportunity to share their research results and discuss potential scientific and engineering developments from their work. This contributed to the success of the conference. The conference proceedings are a compilation of the accepted papers and represent an interesting outcome of the conference. All papers in the proceedings have passed the vigorous review process involving reviewers by the international technical committee. The variety of research topics presented in the conference and novelty exhibited in the papers published in the proceedings demonstrated the impact of CESEE 2023. List of Committees are available in this pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207