A hybrid returns to scale-DEA model for sustainable efficiency evaluation of urban transportation systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The urban transportation network has an undeniable role in addressing the economic, social and environmental issues caused by the traffic. Transportation managers seek to use the existing facilities and capacities in an optimal way to increase customer satisfaction. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an approach to evaluate the performance of the urban transportation system to provide service to citizens effectively. This study develops an approach based on the extended version of the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to measure the nonradial efficiency and super-efficiency of metro-stations considering the sustainability concept. The developed non-radial DEA model considers the hybrid returns to scale the form of technology by combining constant and variable returns to scale assumptions to improve its applicability to identify efficient and inefficient stations. This DEA model also incorporates the non-discretionary inputs and different types of outputs (i.e. undesirable, negative and non-negative) to improve discrimination power and the ability to interpret the results. The findings help decision-makers identify super-efficient stations as a benchmark for future planning and finding the best location to construct metro-stations. Furthermore, this research enables managers to optimally use the resources to increase the transferred passengers, reduce customer dissatisfaction and optimise the annual profit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".