Bibliographic record
Abstract
Türkiye'de kedilerdeki Toxoplasma gondii araştırmaları Toxoplasma gondii studies on cats in Turkey Banuçiçek YÜCESAN 1 (ID) ABSTRACT Toxoplasma gondii (T.gondii) is an intracellular protozoan parasite in the Apicomplexa phylum that can be widely seen all over the world.In this study was performed to evaluate the study areas, test methods, positivity rates, regional results and studies.In this study, Pubmed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus and National Thesis Center databases were examined until 01.04.2022 and T. gondii studies in cats in Turkey were documented.Microscopic, serological [SFDT (Sabin Feldman Dye test), IHA (Indirect hemagglutination test), IFA (Indirect fluorescent antibody test), ELISA (Enzyme lynked immunosorbent assay), CFT (Complement fixation test)] and molecular analysis methods in cats in Turkey (PCR = Polymerized Chain Reaction) was used.21 publications were identified in this metaanalysis.It has been determined that toxoplasmosis studies in cats are mostly seroprevalence studies (16/21).Studies were carried out in Eastern Anatolia (5/21) and Mediterranean Region (4/21), mostly in Central Anatolia (11/21) and Aegean Region (4/21).No study was found in the Marmara, Black Sea and Southeastern Anatolia Regions.It was determined that the regional distributions were Central Anatolia Region (52.32%),Eastern Anatolia Region (45%), Aegean Region (36.33%) and Mediterranean Region ÖZET Toxoplasma gondii (T.gondii); hücre içine yerleşen, tüm Dünya'da yaygın olarak görülebilen Apicomplexa filumunda yer alan protozoon bir parazittir.Bu çalışma ile Türkiye'de kedilerde yapılan T. gondii çalışmaları ele alınmış; çalışma alanları, test yöntemleri, pozitiflik oranları, bölgesel sonuçlar ve yapılan çalışmaların değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Çalışma ile 01.04.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".