MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381569703 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v15n3p1

A Note on Harris Extended Generalized Exponential Distribution

2023· article· en· W4381569703 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Oseghale Osezuwa Innocent, Ayoola Femi Joshua, Oluwole Adegoke Nuga

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsQuantile functionNatural exponential familyExponential functionMoment-generating functionExponential distributionApplied mathematicsExponential familyProbability density functionStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a four-parameter extension of the exponential distribution, which has the Exponentiated exponential, Marshall-Olkin exponential, and exponential distribution as sub-models. The proposed distribution has two important properties: it involves more parameters than the baseline model to obtain more flexibility and the extra parameters have a clear interpretation and representation. The proposed model is more flexible than any of its sub-models. Its probability density function can be monotone increasing, decreasing, or unimodal and its associated hazard rate may be increasing, decreasing, unimodal or bathtub-shaped. Statistical expression is obtained for certain structural statistical properties such as ordinary and incomplete moments, moment generating function, order statistics, quantile function, reliability function, and Renyi entropy. The maximum likelihood estimation method is used to obtain the estimates of the model parameters. An application of the new model to two lifetime data demonstrates the flexibility of the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207