MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381573545 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8066519

STRENGTHENING UNDERGROUND REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES USING EXTERNALLY BONDED CARBON FIBRE-REINFORCED POLYMER SHEETS

2023· paratext· en· W4381573545 on OpenAlexaffabout
Oumaima Awassa, Raafat El‐Hacha, Kevin Falkenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialReinforced concreteCarbon fibersCarbon fiber reinforced polymerStructural engineeringPolymerEngineeringComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally, most of our infrastructures have deteriorated or reached the end of their intended lifespan due to changes in usage or structural degradation. As a consequence, they are in urgent need of repair, strengthening, rehabilitation, or replacement. Canada is no exception and is facing challenges due to the condition of its concrete infrastructure, which requires immediate attention. For instance, the underground core network in Calgary's downtown, which comprises approximately 2735 manholes and 476 transformer vaults, exhibits severe deterioration. While replacing these underground structures with new ones would be ideal; however, it is not an option as it is often financially and operationally impractical due to their location and continuing usage. Therefore, repairing and strengthening these structures using Externally Bonded Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (EB-CFRP) sheets is crucial for the safety of Calgarians. Hence, this paper aims to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of using EB-CFRP sheets to restore the original flexural capacity of these deteriorated structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsFrench-language works237,207