An Imagineering Learning Model using Advance Organizers with Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An imagineering learning model using advance organizers with the internet of things was developed to promote creative innovation for learners in the 21st century. It is an innovation initiated by integrating classroom learning and technology that connects with the internet of things. The objectives of this research were (1) to study and synthesize the conceptual framework of the imagineering learning model using advance organizers with the internet of things, (2) to develop the imagineering learning model, and (3) to assess the appropriateness of the developed model. The participants comprised a purposive sample of five experts from various higher education institutions who have knowledge and ability in designing and developing learning models and teaching and learning systems. Research instruments included the (1) imagineering learning model and (2) assessments of the appropriateness of the proposed model. The results were in line with the expectations of the research team, which found that the proposed imagineering learning model can be used as an instrument to improve teaching and learning by integrating knowledge in computational science subjects with professional courses to develop creative innovations for elementary school learners. By applying imaginary teaching techniques and conceptual maps to cloud learning, the proposed imagineering learning model encourages learners to develop the knowledge and ability to innovate creatively. Knowledge from programming and knowledge of agricultural work in vocational courses must be integrated appropriately.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".