MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381612060 · doi:10.1089/crispr.2023.0007

Rapid and Technically Simple Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Using CRISPR Cas12 and Cas13

2023· article· en· W4381612060 on OpenAlexafffund
Gabriel Lamothe, Julie Carbonneau, Charles Joly Beauparlant, Thierry Vincent, Patrik Quessy, Anthony Guedon, Gary Kobinger, Jean‐François Lemay, Guy Boivin, Arnaud Droit, Nathalie Turgeon, Jacques P. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe CRISPR Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecCentre National en Électrochimie et en Technologies EnvironnementalesCollège ShawiniganCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversité LavalHéma-QuébecCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCRISPRLoop-mediated isothermal amplificationSanger sequencingAmpliconComputational biologyPipeline (software)Computer sciencePalindromeNanopore sequencingBiologyVirologyMutationGeneticsPolymerase chain reactionGenomeGeneOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The worldwide proliferation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the past 3 years has allowed the virus to accumulate numerous mutations. Dangerous lineages have emerged one after another, each leading to a new wave of the pandemic. In this study, we have developed the THRASOS pipeline to rapidly discover lineage-specific mutation signatures and thus advise the development of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-based diagnostic tests. We also optimized a strategy to modify loop-mediated isothermal amplification amplicons for downstream use with Cas12 and Cas13 for future multiplexing. The close ancestry of the BA.1 and BA.2 variants of SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron) made these excellent candidates for the development of a first test using this workflow. With a quick turnaround time and low requirements for laboratory equipment, the test we have created is ideally suited for settings such as mobile clinics lacking equipment such as Next-Generation Sequencers or Sanger Sequencers and the personnel to run these devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe CRISPR JournalSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207