A Ground Point Fitting Method for Winter Wheat Height Estimation Using UAV-Based SfM Point Cloud Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Height is a key factor in monitoring the growth status and rate of crops. Compared with large-scale satellite remote sensing images and high-cost LiDAR point cloud, the point cloud generated by the Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithm based on UAV images can quickly estimate crop height in the target area at a lower cost. However, crop leaves gradually start to cover the ground from the beginning of the stem elongation stage, making more and more ground points below the canopy disappear in the data. The terrain undulations and outliers will seriously affect the height estimation accuracy. This paper proposed a ground point fitting method to estimate the height of winter wheat based on the UAV SfM point cloud. A canopy slice filter was designed to reduce the interference of middle canopy points and outliers. Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) was applied to obtain the ground points from the valid filtered point cloud. Then, the missing ground points were fitted according to the known ground points. Furthermore, we achieved crop height monitoring at the stem elongation stage with an R2 of 0.90. The relative root mean squared error (RRMSE) of height estimation was 5.9%, and the relative mean absolute error (RMAE) was 4.6% at the stem elongation stage. This paper proposed the canopy slice filter and fitting missing ground points. It was concluded that the canopy slice filter successfully optimized the extraction of ground points and removed outliers. Fitting the missing ground points simulated the terrain undulations effectively and improved the accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it