Natural Rayleigh Benard Convection Of Bingham Fluid In Enclosure Cavity With Sinusoidal Profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, two-dimensional steady-state simulations of laminar natural convection of Rayleigh Benard in square enclosure were performed. The enclosure is considered to be completely filled with a yield stress fluid obeying viscoplastic model Bingham. The vertical lateral walls are thermally isolated, whereas sinusoidal temperature distributions with different amplitudes and phases are imposed over the horizontal walls. Fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics are systematically studied over a wide range of Phase deviation (0-) and amplitude ration (0-1). We have fixed the Rayleigh number (Ra = 10 5 ), Prandtl number (Pr = 7), and finally the Bingham number (Bn = 0.5). The Navier-Stokes equations, the mass and energy conservation equations, are solved numerically using CFD software FLUENT 15. The results shows that the Nusselt number decreases with the increase of the Bingham number, and for the large values of the latter the heat transfer is done by conduction. It is also noteworthy that the increase in the phase difference and the amplitude ratio leads to the increase in the heat transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".