MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381619375 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt23.138

Predictions of Dynamic property for Gas Foil Bearings Based on Multi-physics Three-dimensional Model of Computer Aided Engineering Simulations

2023· article· en· W4381619375 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tai Yuan Yu, Pei-Jen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Tsing Hua University
KeywordsProperty (philosophy)FOIL methodFoil bearingProperty valueMechanical engineeringPhysicsAerospace engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the dynamic characteristic analysis model of the bump type gas foil bearing.The analysis model is capable of analyzing the interaction between the components and the thin working fluid film based on fluid-structure interaction finite element method when the bearing is operating.In order to make it, researchers can analyze the effect of different bearing foil structure equivalent stiffnesses on bearing operating characteristics, such as the pressure and temperature distribution patterns in the working fluid film, stiffness and damping coefficient of the bearing, etc.The top and bump foils in the foil structure of bearing are modeled as an infinite number of Hookean springs attached to the stiff wall of the housing while the hydrodynamic pressure distributions exerting on the springs are modeled as gas film working in steady state lubrication condition.The complete three dimensional multiphysics model built by commercial computer-aided engineering package, which can do the calculation based on finite element method independently for the fluid and solid domain.After that, the model can transfer the analysis results to each other at the interface between those models to do the simulation until the system reaches a quasi-steady state.Some environment states of bearing during operation will be set as the boundary condition and input to the model.The results of the simulation model are in good agreement with the experimental results of published research papers.In order to verify the various operating characteristics of the bearings and compare the results with the analytical model in the future, an internal experimental test bench has been established also.That test bench has the ability to confirm the working characteristics of bearings at different speeds and bearing loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicTribology and Lubrication EngineeringFrench-language works237,207