Evaluasi dan Pengelolaan Gerakan Massa Tanah Di Dusun Ngablak, Kalurahan Sitimulyo, Kapanewon Piyungan, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perubahan iklim yang saat ini terjadi merupakan fenomena yang dapat menyebabkan berbagai bencana alam, sebagai contoh adanya gerakan massa tanah akibat pola kekeringan dan curah hujan yang tidak sesuai. Gerakan Massa Tanah terjadi di Dusun Ngablak, Kalurahan Sitimulyo berada di Kapanewon Piyungan, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta pada tanggal 7 Januari 2021. Gerakan Massa Tanah yang terjadi tidak menimbulkan adanya korban jiwa, hanya terdapat 2 rumah warga yang terancam. Tujuan dari penelitian yaitu untuk mengetahui tingkat kestabilan lereng dengan menghitung Faktor Keamanan (FK). Penelitian menggunakan metode analisis data kestabilan lereng dengan menggunakan metode Janbu Yang Disederhanakan. Perhitungan nilai FK termasuk ke dalam klasifikasi labil. Nilai FK pada Lereng I berada pada kisaran 0,419 – 0,825, sedangkan nilai FK Lereng II berkisar 0,716 – 0,880. Pembuatan dinding penahan tanah merupakan teknik rekayasa yang dapat dilakukan pada lokasi penelitian.Kata Kunci: Dinding Penahan Tanah; GMT; Faktor Keamanan; Metode Janbu; Tingkat Kestabilan Lereng
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".