MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381621757 · doi:10.31315/psb.v4i1.8904

Pengembangan Model Desain Rumah Bantuan bagi Keluarga Terdampak Bencana Angin Siklon di Indonesia

2023· article· id· W4381621757 on OpenAlexaff
Dyah Nunki Yalesrie, Yohana Noradika Maharani, Johan Danu Prasetya, Tedy Agung Cahyadi

Bibliographic record

VenueProsiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Lingkungan Kebumian SATU BUMI · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryPhysicsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Siklon tropis merupakan bencana yang belum dikenal dalam Database Informasi Bencana Indonesia (DIBI). Ketika siklon tropis Seroja menghantam wilayah Nusa Tenggara Timur 4 April 2021, secara tidak langsung telah menyebabkan ratusan korban meninggal dan puluhan ribu rumah serta bangunan lainnya rusak berat. Saat ini di Indonesia belum ada standar rumah dan bangunan yang tahan terhadap kecepatan angin siklon. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan desain rumah yang dapat dijadikan model bagi aktor kebencanaan bidang perumahan dalam menyediakan hunian ramah angin di wilayah terdampak maupun rawan bencana angin siklon. Model desain dikembangkan berdasarkan panduan, rekomendasi, dan preseden dari negara lain yang kemudian disesuaikan dengan konteks Indonesia. Model “Rumah Inti” dirasa lebih sesuai dengan konteks Indonesia daripada model rumah semi permanen yang menggunakan dinding batu setengah tinggi dan papan kayu di bagian atasnya. Dengan model Rumah Inti, struktur bangunan ramah gempa dapat dipersiapkan terlebih dahulu. Hal ini juga berguna bagi keluarga penerima bantuan ketika akan merenovasi atau mengembangkan rumahnya di masa yang akan datang.Kata Kunci: Angin Siklon; Rumah Bantuan; Rumah Inti; Konstruksi; Model Desain

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProsiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Lingkungan Kebumian SATU BUMISame topicOccupational Health and Safety ManagementFrench-language works237,207