Analisis Kesesuaian Wisata Di Pantai Glagah, Kalurahan Glagah, Kapanewon Temon, Kabupaten Kulon Progo, D.I. Yogyakarta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pantai Glagah merupakan salah satu wisata pantai yang terletak di Kulon Progo yang termasuk kedalam Kawasan Strategis Pariwisata Daerah (KSPD) dimana didalamnya terdapat daya tarik wisata alam pantai dengan didukung oleh wisata kuliner tepi laut dan surga makanan hasil laut (Seafood Paradise). Pantai Glagah memiliki potensi bencana berupa gelombang pasang dan angin kencang. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis tingkat kesesuaian wisata. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Data diperoleh melalui metode purposive sampling, wawancara, matematis berupa skoring, dan analisis deskriptif. Parameter kesesuaian wisata terdiri dari kedalaman perairan, lebar pantai, tipe pantai, kemiringan pantai, kecepatan arus, material dasar perairan, kecerahan perairan, biota berbahaya, ketersediaan air tawar, dan tutupan lahan. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan analisis kesesuaian wisata di Pantai Glagah didapatkan hasil indeks kesesuaian wisata ∑IKW sebesar 64,90% yaitu sesuai (S2). Kata Kunci: Kesesuaian Wisata, Pantai, Wisata
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".