Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan Kawasan Pariwisata di Pantai Kuwaru, Desa Poncosari, Kecamatan Srandakan, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta memiliki potensi sumber daya pesisir yang berlimpah. Perkembangan wisata mulai meningkat sekitar tahun 2015-2019. Pantai Kuwaru adalah pantai yang strategis sebagai kawasan untuk wisata keluarga dan Pendidikan yang berada di bagian pantai selatan wilayah Bantul. Pada tanggal 5 Juni 2017 terjadi bencana abrasi yang mengakibatkan terjadinya kerusakan pada bangunan di Pantai Kuwaru. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu mengevaluasi kesesuaian lahan untuk wisata Pantai Kuwaru. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode survei dan pemetaan, metode skoring dan pembobotan, dengan melakukan pengukuran pada 6 parameter yaitu tipe pantai, lebar pantai, material daar Perairan, kemiringan pantai, tutupan lahan pantai, dan ketersediaan air tawar. Berdasarkan evaluasi didapatkan hasil nilai kesesuaian lahan di Pantai Kuwaru sebesar 44 % yaitu kategori S3 (sesuai bersyarat). Penelitian ini kiranya dapat dijadikan evaluasi atau rekomendasi untuk mengelola dan mengembangkan Pantai Kuwaru kedepannya. Kata Kunci : Evaluasi; Kesesuaian Lahan; Pantai; Pariwisata
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".