Region-Based Sea Ice Mapping Using Compact Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery with Learned Features and Contextual Information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Operational sea ice maps are usually generated manually using dual-polarization (DP) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite imagery, but there is strong interest in automating this process. Recently launched satellites offer compact polarimetry (CP) imagery that provides more comprehensive polarimetric information compared to DP, which compels the use of CP for automated classification of SAR sea ice imagery. Existing sea ice scene classification algorithms using CP imagery rely on handcrafted features, while neural networks offer the potential of features that are more discriminating. We have developed a new and effective sea ice classification algorithm that leverages the nature of CP data. First, a residual-based convolutional neural network (ResCNN) is implemented to classify each pixel. In parallel, an unsupervised segmentation is performed to generate regions based on CP statistical properties. Regions are assigned a single class label by majority voting using the ResCNN output. For testing, quad-polarimetric (QP) SAR sea ice scenes from the RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) are used, and QP, DP, CP, and reconstructed QP modes are compared for classification accuracy, while also comparing them to other classification approaches. Using CP achieves an overall accuracy of 96.86%, which is comparable to QP (97.16%), and higher than reconstructed QP and DP data by about 2% and 10%, respectively. The implemented algorithm using CP imagery provides an improved option for automated sea ice mapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".