MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381681309 · doi:10.21105/joss.04724

The sspm R package for spatially-explicit surplusproduction population models

2023· article· en· W4381681309 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStock (firearms)Production (economics)EcosystemPopulationStock assessmentComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementShrimpProduction modelFisheryBusinessGeographyEnvironmental scienceEcologyEconomicsMicroeconomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population models are important tools for making management decisions, especially in fisheries, where predictive methods like Surplus Production Models (SPMs) are widely used.Fisheries analysts and managers often lack user-friendly, flexible tools to implement and apply SPMs.In addition, SPMs are rarely spatially explicit and usually cannot account for relevant ecosystem drivers.Therefore, there is a need for tools that implement spatially explicit surplus production models (SSPMs).The Northern Shrimp stock in the Newfoundland and Labrador Shelves is an example of a stock in need of an SSPM that can integrate important spatially-structured ecosystem drivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it