"O futuro já começou"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo analisa enunciados extraídos de coleções didáticas do Projeto de Vida, aprovadas pelo Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático (PNLD), edição de 2021, com vistas a examinar como esses materiais balizam a construção do discente como um empreendedor de si, considerando as inflexões da racionalidade neoliberal no campo da educação. Partindo disso, pauta-se em autores como Foucault (2008a), Dardot e Laval (2016), Brown (2019), dentre outros. A metodologia segue uma abordagem descritivo-interpretativa, documental e de natureza qualitativa. O corpus foi formado por quinze enunciados recortados de três coleções didáticas do Projeto de Vida, mais especificamente o #Meu futuro projeto de vida, Caminhar e construir, bem como Planejando a jornada: um guia para seu projeto de vida. As análises possibilitam entrever que a constituição do empreendedor de si passa necessariamente pelo domínio de competências requeridas para a efetivação de um projeto de vida em franca conformidade com o regime neoliberal. Diante disso, podemos ponderar que esses materiais didáticos refletem os interesses mercadológicos subjacentes à Reforma do Ensino Médio, Lei nº 13.415/2017 e à Base Nacional Comum Curricular do Ensino Médio (BNCC-EM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".