Striatonigrostriatal connectivity‐based cross‐species parcellation of human and macaque substantia nigra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anatomical and functional heterogeneous substantia nigra (SN) has been extensively studied in humans and animals like rhesus monkeys given its crucial role in modulating a broad range of behaviors. Increasingly important cross-species research of SN may require connectionally homogeneous and homologous subregions of SN as objective and stable starting points from which the evolutionary characteristics of brain could be inspected. However, existing atlases of SN were all inaccurate mappings as a cross-species connectome atlas due to inadequate homology constraint during their constructions, and arbitrary paired use of these atlases might cause unreliable findings. In this study, a reliable blind-source cross-species parcellation of SN was developed based on the following rationale: striatonigrostriatal circuits form major structure of nigral connectivity; different nigral components have unique striatonigrostriatal connectivity; and inter-species corresponding human and macaque nigral components have similar striatonigrostriatal connectivity. Specifically, all voxels in human and macaque SN were grouped together and then classified based on inter-species identically characterized striatonigrostriatal connectivity attributes. Our results delineated a pars compacta-pars reticulate-like parcellation and further demonstrated its reliability by illustrating best-matched whole-brain structural and functional connectivity profiles of inter-species corresponding nigral subregions. Detailed inter-species and inter-regional differences in multi-aspect connectivities of these nigral subregions were inspected. It is expected that this cross-species connectome atlas of SN can offer biologically reliable cornerstones and important information to facilitate future cross-species research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".