MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381716077 · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00082

Discovery of a Novel DCAF1 Ligand Using a Drug–Target Interaction Prediction Model: Generalizing Machine Learning to New Drug Targets

2023· article· en· W4381716077 on OpenAlexafffund
Serah Kimani, Julie Owen, Stuart R. Green, Fengling Li, Yanjun Li, Aiping Dong, Peter J. Brown, Suzanne Ackloo, David Kuter, Cindy Yang, Miranda MacAskill, Stephen S. MacKinnon, C.H. Arrowsmith, Matthieu Schapira, Vijay Shahani, Levon Halabelian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsStructural Genomics ConsortiumPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersStructural Genomics ConsortiumH2020 HealthNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGenome Canada
KeywordsCheminformaticsUbiquitin ligaseVirtual screeningDrug discoveryDocking (animal)UbiquitinComputational biologyChemistryLigand (biochemistry)BiologyBioinformaticsBiochemistryMedicineGeneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E3 ubiquitin ligases. The WDR domain of DCAF1 serves as a binding platform for substrate proteins and is also targeted by HIV and SIV lentiviral adaptors to induce the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of antiviral host factors. It is therefore attractive both as a potential therapeutic target for the development of chemical inhibitors and as an E3 ligase that could be recruited by novel PROTACs for targeted protein degradation. In this study, we used a proteome-scale drug-target interaction prediction model, MatchMaker, combined with cheminformatics filtering and docking to identify ligands for the DCAF1 WDR domain. Biophysical screening and X-ray crystallographic studies of the predicted binders confirmed a selective ligand occupying the central cavity of the WDR domain. This study shows that artificial intelligence-enabled virtual screening methods can successfully be applied in the absence of previously known ligands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Information and ModelingSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207