Difluoromethylborates and Muonium for the Study of Isonitrile Insertion Affording Phenanthridines via Imidoyl Radicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The 6-(difluoromethyl)phenanthridine unit is a highly attractive fluoroalkyl-substituted planar nitrogen heterocycle in pharmaceutical and agrochemical research. In this paper, we report that difluoromethylborates can be used as a source of difluoromethyl radicals for isonitrile insertion, leading to 6-(difluoromethyl)phenanthridines. Tuning the aryl substituents in the difluoromethylborates and oxidizing reagents enabled the synthesis of 6-(difluoromethyl)phenanthridines through the generation of difluoromethyl radical and spontaneous intramolecular cyclization of the CF 2 H-imidoyl radical intermediates. The presence of difluoromethyl radicals was experimentally confirmed, and the reaction mechanisms including imidoyl radical and prompt cyclization reactions could be supported theoretically. Furthermore, we obtained valuable information about the imidoyl radical intermediate by performing transverse-field muon spin rotation (TF-μSR) measurements of 2-isocyano-4′-methoxy-1,1′-biphenyl and using density functional theory (DFT) calculations to interpret the spectra. Muonium, a simple free radical, preferentially adds to the carbon atom of the isonitrile unit, yielding the corresponding imidoyl radical. The temperature dependence of the muon hyperfine coupling constant and the spin relaxation of the muoniated radical signal are compatible with the intramolecular cyclization of biaryl-substituted imidoyl radicals on the μs time scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".