Origin, Emergence, Formation, Development, and Current State of Organized Crime in Ukraine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Criminal Code (hereinafter CC) of the Ukrainian SSR (§2, Art.41) only once provided for a crime committed by an organized group as an aggravating circumstance in any crime till 1989 [1]. At the close of 80-s and in 90-s especially the country faced a fast-growing and serious challenge from organized crime that caused a classifying circumstance - a commission by an organized criminal group (hereinafter OCG) amended in 20 articles, the Special Part, CC. Regulations, Session of the Supreme Court and Methodical Instructions, the Ministry of Interior did not give an appropriate definition of OCG. As a result law enforcement and, first of all, the Ministry of Interior agencies did not have strict legislative acts to define OCG from traditional groups of criminals. All the cited above could not but adversely affect the struggle against organized crime. According to the statistical data for 1991-2023, annual Reports on combating organized criminal groups, the Ministry of Interior the status of organized crime is as follows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it