A Dual Color Pax7 and Myf5 In Vivo Reporter to Investigate Muscle Stem Cell Heterogeneity in Regeneration and Aging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Increasing evidence suggests heterogeneity in the muscle stem cell (MuSC) pool. In particular, a rare subset of Pax7 positive MuSCs that has never expressed the myogenic regulatory factor Myf5 has enhanced self-renewal and engraftment characteristics. However, the scarcity and limited availability of protein markers make the characterization of these cells challenging. We describe the generation of StemRep reporter mice allowing to monitor Pax7 and Myf5 protein based on equimolar levels of dual nuclear fluorescence. High levels of Pax7 protein and low levels of Myf5 delineate a deeply quiescent MuSC subpopulation with distinct molecular signatures and dynamics of activation, proliferation, and commitment. Aging decreases the number of these cells, and skews the MuSC pool towards Myf5- High cells with impaired quiescence. Altogether, we describe a novel deeply quiescent MuSC subpopulation whose maintenance is impaired in old muscles, and establish the StemRep line as a versatile tool to study quiescence and MuSC heterogeneity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".