MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381730781 · doi:10.5114/pm.2022.127032

Advance care planning

2022· article· en· W4381730781 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agnieszka Toczek-Wasiak, Wojciech Wasiak, Tomasz Dzierżanowski

Bibliographic record

VenueMedycyna Paliatywna · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalliative careAdvance care planningMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planowanie opieki z wyprzedzeniem (advance care planning -ACP) to proces komunikacji między pacjentem, jego bliskimi a personelem medycznym i innymi osobami zaangażowanymi w opiekę polegający na uzgodnieniu planu przyszłej opieki z uwzględnieniem preferencji chorego.Zaplanowanie i ustalenie celów przyszłej opieki jest wyrazem autonomii decyzyjnej chorych i stanowi podstawę do świadczenia holistycznej i zindywidualizowanej opieki.Praktyki ACP od czasu wprowadzenia ewoluują.Obecnie podkreśla się znaczenie rodziny, empatycznej komunikacji i interwencji skierowanych bezpośrednio do pacjenta.Planowanie opieki z wyprzedzeniem nie jest w Polsce rozpowszechnione, brak jest również odpowiednich regulacji prawnych w tym zakresie. Słowa kluczowe:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3450.248

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedycyna PaliatywnaSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207