Self-Learned Autonomous Driving at Unsignalized Intersections: A Hierarchical Reinforced Learning Approach for Feasible Decision-Making
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reinforcement learning-based techniques, empowered by deep-structured neural nets, have demonstrated superiority over rule-based methods in terms of making high-level behavioral decisions due to qualities related to handling large state spaces. Nonetheless, their training time, sample efficiency and the feasibility of the learnt behaviors remain key concerns. In this paper, we propose a novel hierarchical reinforcement learning-based decision-making architecture for learning left-turn policies at unsignalized intersections with feasibility guarantees. The proposed technique is comprised of two layers; a high-level learning-based behavioral planning layer which adopts soft actor-critic (SAC) principles to learn high-level, non-conservative yet safe, driving behaviors, and a low-level motion planning layer that uses Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework to ensure feasibility of the two-dimensional left-turn maneuver. The high-level layer generates reference signals of velocity and yaw angles for the ego vehicle taking into account safety and collision avoidance with the intersection vehicles, whereas the low-level motion planning layer solves an optimization problem to track these reference commands taking into account several vehicle dynamic constraints and ride comfort. While training the behavioral SAC-based planning layer, We develop an adaptive entropy regularization technique that results in faster convergence, higher mean rewards, and lower collision rates. We validate the proposed decision-making scheme in simulated environments and compare with other model free Reinforcement Learning (RL) baselines. The results demonstrate that the proposed integrated framework possesses better training and navigation capabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".