MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381734434 · doi:10.2337/db23-53-or

53-OR: Efficacy and Safety of Coadministered s.c. Semaglutide and s.c. Cagrilintide in Type 2 Diabetes

2023· article· en· W4381734434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juan P. Frías, Srikanth Deenadayalan, Lars Erichsen, FILIP K. KNOP, ILDIKO LINGVAY, Stanislava Macura, Chantal Mathieu, Sue D. Pedersen, Melanie J. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationSemaglutideClinical endpointType 2 diabetesWeight lossInternal medicineGlycemicRandomized controlled trialHypoglycemiaExenatideAdverse effectMetforminDiabetes mellitusInsulinEndocrinologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combining sema (semaglutide 2.4 mg) and amylin analog cagri (cagrilintide 2.4 mg) has weight loss benefits, but the impact on HbA1c is unknown. This study is the first to assess the efficacy and safety of CagriSema (co-administered) vs sema or cagri alone in participants (pts) with T2D. In this phase 2 (NCT04982575), multicenter, double-blind trial, adults with T2D (HbA1c 7.5-10.0%) and BMI ≥27 kg/m2 on metformin ± SGLT2i, were randomized to once-weekly s.c. CagriSema, sema, or cagri for 32 weeks (all escalated over 16 weeks to 2.4 mg). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c; key secondary endpoints were body weight and safety. Of the 92 pts randomized (64% male; mean age 58 years and T2D duration 8.7 years), those receiving CagriSema had significantly greater reductions in HbA1c (vs cagri) and body weight (vs sema and cagri) at week 32 (Figure). The proportion of pts achieving HbA1c <7.0% and ≤6.5%, were 89% and 75% for CagriSema, 69% and 48% for sema, and 33% and 17% for cagri at week 32. GI AEs were most common (58% for CagriSema, 32% for sema, and 33% for cagri), were mainly mild/moderate, occurred during dose escalation, and lead to treatment discontinuation in 0%, 3%, and 0% of pts with CagriSema, sema, and cagri, respectively; no level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia was reported. CagriSema improved glycemic control and led to significant weight loss vs both sema or cagri, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Disclosure J.P.Frias: Advisory Panel; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, Consultant; Akero Therapeutics, Inc., 89bio, Inc., Aimmune, Boehringer Ingelheim Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Carmot Therapeutics, Inc., Echosens, Merck & Co., Inc., Metacrine, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, Employee; Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Research Support; Akero Therapeutics, Inc., 89bio, Inc., Altimmune, Axcella Health Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Carmot Therapeutics, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Metacrine, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, Speaker's Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi. S.Deenadayalan: Employee; Novo Nordisk A/S. L.Erichsen: None. F.K.Knop: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Consultant; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; Novo Nordisk, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Lundbeck. I.Lingvay: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk A/S, Lilly Diabetes, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi, Consultant; Carmot Therapeutics, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Pfizer Inc., Intercept, Intarcia, Valeritas, TargetRWE, Shionogi, Zealand Pharma, Structure, Bayer, Research Support; Novo Nordisk A/S, Boehringer-Ingelheim. S.Macura: Employee; Novo Nordisk A/S, Stock/Shareholder; Novo Nordisk A/S. C.Mathieu: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk A/S, Boehringer Ingelheim Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Roche Diabetes Care, Imcyse, Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk A/S, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. S.D.Pedersen: Advisory Panel; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., AstraZeneca, HLS Therapeutics Inc., Bayer Inc., Viatris Inc., Bausch + Lomb, Research Support; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Applied Therapeutics Inc., Speaker's Bureau; Abbott Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Pfizer Inc., HLS Therapeutics Inc., Bayer Inc., Bausch + Lomb. M.J.Davies: Advisory Panel; Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer Inc., Medtronic, ShouTi Pharma Inc., Consultant; Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Research Support; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Speaker's Bureau; Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited, Novartis, Sanofi. Funding Novo Nordisk A/S

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerFrench-language works237,207