MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381735259 · doi:10.3233/aise230004

A Survey of Smart Grid Intrusion Detection Datasets

2023· book-chapter· en· W4381735259 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed M. Alani, Thar Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueAmbient intelligence and smart environments · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart gridIntrusion detection systemGlobeComputer securityGridComputer scienceIntrusion prevention systemIntrusionEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the rapid growth of smart grid applications all over the globe, it has become a more attractive target to malicious actors. Countries and stakeholders (e.g., governments) spend billions of dollars on ensuring the continuity and security of their smart grids for strategic and operational reasons. In fact, the risk associated with compromising a smart grid is considered among the highest in the cybersecurity world. This paper surveys a group of well-known smart grid intrusion detection datasets that are used in the development of machine learning-based intrusion detection systems. The study presents an analysis of these datasets and provides recommendations for researchers utilizing them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmbient intelligence and smart environmentsSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207