Suprachoroidal and vitreous haemorrhage as a presenting feature of metastatic melanoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A man in his 70s presented with right ocular pain, vision loss and temporal headache 4 days after undergoing laser peripheral iridotomy. The patient had lost 10 lbs over the preceding 6 weeks and had a medical history significant for a previously excised melanoma of the left arm. During the course of investigations, the patient was referred to oncology for workup, ultimately leading to a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma. Visceral metastases were identified in the lungs, right anterior fourth rib, left femoral distal diaphysis and medial side of the right globe. The patient decompensated and died shortly after his first radiotherapy treatment.This is the first published report of suprachoroidal haemorrhage secondary to metastasis from suspected cutaneous melanoma. The case highlights the importance of considering malignancy on the differential diagnosis for a suprachoroidal haemorrhage of unknown aetiology and involving oncology early for workup and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".