MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Instant Messaging Application Encrypted Traffic Generation System

2023· article· en· W4381744914 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsSolana Networks (Canada)Dalhousie University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceInstant messagingTraffic analysisAndroid (operating system)Computer networkComputer securityOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Instant Messaging Applications (IMAs) have become the leading communication tool for smartphone users. While it is insightful for network operators and security researchers to monitor and analyze the network traffic of their organization, there is a lack of research on IMA encrypted traffic analysis. In a companion work [1], we introduced a flow-based encrypted IMA traffic analysis using a data driven approach. Given the lack of publicly available data in this area, a new encrypted IMA traffic generation system is designed and implemented to automatically generate and label encrypted IMA traffic including Discord, Facebook Messenger, Signal, Microsoft Teams, Telegram, and WhatsApp. The new system utilizes a combination of open-source tools to emulate user behavior, to capture, filter and label the resulting traffic directly on an Android device. This demonstration shows the functionality of the proposed system via data generation, capture, and analysis of the six IMAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it