MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Intelligent Data-Plane with a Quantized ML Model for Traffic Management

2023· article· en· W4381744942 on OpenAlexaff
Kaiyi Zhang, Nancy Samaan, Ahmed Karmouch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuantization (signal processing)Forwarding planeReal-time computingSpeedupInferenceArtificial intelligenceNetwork packetAlgorithmParallel computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Offloading some of the traffic management decision-making functionalities to intelligent data-planes (IDPs) can significantly enhance the accuracy and adaptation speed of network services. An IDP executes, at line-speed, one or more machine learning (ML) models for real-time inference and decision making. Unfortunately, existing IDP deployments either realize only a limited set of ML models such as decision trees or require substantial modifications in the switch hardware. These limitations can be attributed to the inherent scarcity of both the computational and memory resources and the strict high-speed per-packet processing demands. To address the aforementioned limitations, we propose a novel ML-based management framework, the in-network quantized ML architecture (INQ-MLA). First, INQ-MLA delegates the task of training and continuously optimizing the IDP ML model to the control-plane. The latter adopts a tailored quantization-aware training process to compensate for the effect of precision loss due to quantization. Second, INQ-MLA employs an efficient quantization mechanism to transform the trained ML model parameters (e.g., weights and activation functions outputs) from floating-point representations to smaller low precision fixed integer values that can be easily processed and stored in the data-plane. Finally, INQ-MLA ensures that the deployed ML model is integrated into the IDP pipeline by limiting all its execution operations to simplified arithmetic operations that are available in most switches. We developed a proof-of-concept implementation of our proposed architecture using P4-based switches. Experimental results demonstrate that INQ-MLA can achieve a high-level of accuracy at runtime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207