TinyHAR: Benchmarking Human Activity Recognition Systems in Resource Constrained Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advances in deep learning, especially Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have revolutionized intelligent frame-works such as Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems by effectively and efficiently inferring human activity from various modalities of data. However, the training and inference of CNNs are often resource-intensive. Recent research developments are focused on bringing the effectiveness of CNNs in resource con-strained edge devices through Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML). However, this is extremely hard to achieve due to the limitations in memory, compute power, and energy of resource constrained edge devices. This paper provides a benchmark to understand these trade-offs among variations of CNN network architectures, different training methodologies, and different modalities of data in the context of HAR, TinyML, and edge devices. We tested and reported the performance of CNN and Depthwise Separable CNN (DSCNN) models as well as two training methodologies: Quantization Aware Training (QAT) and Post-training Quantization (PTQ) on five commonly used benchmark datasets containing image and time-series data: UP-Fall, Fall Detection Dataset (FDD), PAMAP2, UCI-HAR, and WISDM. We also deployed and tested the performance of the model-based standalone applications on multiple commonly available resource constrained edge devices in terms of inference time and power consumption. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of Tiny ML for HAR in edge devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".