MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381786842 · doi:10.23906/ri2022.br01

Promoting curiosity: introducing Portugal to Critical Theory

2022· article· pt· W4381786842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruno Massara Rocha

Bibliographic record

VenueRelações Internacionais · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHistory, Culture, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuriosityEpistemologyPsychologyComputer scienceSocial psychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

the centenary of the establishment of the first Chair in International Politics at the University of Aberystwyth.Since this relative autonomisation in the face of Political Science, IR have been the stage for a variety of debates, turning points and the emergence of new schools of thought that challenge their ontological, epistemological and methodological groundwork.However, involvement in these discussions has been geographically uneven.There are epistemic spaces, such as the Canadian and Brazilian academias, which are engaged in the production of this theoretical pluralism, and other spaces that remain withdrawn from the debate, such as the Portuguese academia, whose contribution to this produc-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelações InternacionaisSame topicHistory, Culture, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207