Travel Time Probability Prediction Based on Constrained LSTM Quantile Regression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Travel time reliability assessment has been widely used in recent years to evaluate the performance of transportation networks and measure the operation level of transportation systems. Weather, as one of the important factors influencing travel time reliability, affects the relationship between the supply and requirement of urban road networks. Considering the traffic characteristics under different traffic conditions, a study on the influence of weather on travel time reliability under different conditions is proposed to predict the probability of travelers completing their trips within the expected time under different weather conditions. Based on the urban road network data and cab trajectory data of Harbin city, this paper correlates the floating vehicle location with the road network information through a hidden Markov model to reduce the influence of vehicle trajectory errors on the calculation results of path travel time. To analyze the entire distribution of extreme travel time and its impact on the reliability of travel time under various traffic situations, it captures the tail features of the travel time distribution based on extreme value theory. Then, to increase the predictability of each quantile, it combines a deep-learning LSTM model and a quantile regression model to create a probabilistic travel time prediction model utilizing combined layers. The proposed model is compared with the linear quantile regression and neural network quantile regression models, and the model is evaluated in terms of point prediction results and probabilistic prediction results, respectively, to ensure the accuracy of predictions from the model. As a result, the prediction accuracy of the model in this paper is greatly improved, and the degree of violating quantile constraints is greatly reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".