Analytical Approximation-Based Approach for Passenger Flow Control Strategy in Oversaturated Urban Rail Transit Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Focusing on a heavily congested urban rail corridor, this study investigates the passenger flow control strategy optimization problem from a mesoscopic perspective to reduce platform congestion and enhance service quality. Based on a quadratic functional approximation for passenger arrival rates, an analytical formula for calculating passenger waiting time is derived based on the classic deterministic queueing theory. We formulate the problem as a continuous nonlinear programming model to minimize the total passenger waiting time within transportation capacity constraints. A Lagrangian relaxation approach effectively transforms the original complex problem into an unconstrained minimization program. The analytical solution relating to optimal flow control strategy is derived by directly solving the unconstrained program. To further provide an integrated optimization framework from both the supply and demand sides, we extend the abovementioned passenger flow control optimization model into an integrated mixed-integer nonlinear programming model to jointly optimize the passenger-flow control strategy and train frequency setting. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed models. The computational results show that the produced high-quality passenger flow control strategy significantly reduces total passenger delay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".