Millimetric scale two-photon Bessel-Gauss beam light sheet microscopy with three-axis isotropic resolution using an axicon lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SignificanceTypical light sheet microscopes suffer from artifacts related to the geometry of the light sheet. One main inconvenience is the non-uniform thickness of the light sheet obtained with a Gaussian laser beam.AimWe developed a two-photon light sheet microscope that takes advantage of a thin and long Bessel-Gauss beam illumination to increase the sheet extent without compromising the resolution.ApproachWe use an axicon lens placed directly at the output of an amplified femtosecond laser to produce a long Bessel-Gauss beam on the sample. We studied the dopaminergic system and its projections in a whole cleared mouse brain.ResultsOur light sheet microscope allows an isotropic resolution of 2.4 μm in all three axes of the scanned volume while keeping a millimetric-sized field of view, and a fast acquisition rate of up to 34 mm2 / s. With slight modifications to the optical setup, the sheet extent can be increased to 6 mm.ConclusionThe proposed system’s sheet extent and resolution surpass currently available systems, enabling the fast imaging of large specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".