MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381839257 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000034100

Case series: Noninfectious myositis of temporal muscle: a report of 2 cases

2023· article· en· W4381839257 on OpenAlexaff
M Kong, Kyung‐Hoe Huh, Hong‐Seop Kho

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTemporomandibular Joint Disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinemyalgiaPalpationMyositisMagnetic resonance imagingPhysical examinationTemporomandibular jointPathognomonicPterygoid MusclesRadiologyMasticatory forceSurgeryPathologyOrthodonticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Noninfectious myositis (NIM) of the masticatory muscles is uncommon local myalgia disorder persisted by a centrally-mediated neurogenic mechanism. Due to the rarity of this condition and the lack of appropriate data regarding it, diagnosing this pathology when it affects the temporal muscle (TM) is challenging. CASE PRESENTATION: Clinical signs and symptoms, diagnostic process, and treatment outcome of 2 rare cases of NIM of the TM were presented. The signs and symptoms of the patients were not pathognomonic. There were restrictions on the mouth opening and lateral excursion of the mandible. The duration of the symptoms may not be chronic. The findings of clinical evaluation may indicate the diagnosis of anterior disc displacement (DD) without reduction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and/or local myalgia. Swelling of the involved muscle could be evident and identified on palpation depending on the involved site of myositis. The axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was important for the accurate diagnosis of this rare condition. Application of non-surgical conservative treatment modalities such as administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics for a sufficient period of time, control of oral parafunctional habits, and jaw exercises were effective for the management of NIM of the TM. CONCLUSION: A thorough clinical examination and MR imaging including the axial T2-weighted view are required for accurate diagnosis and effective management of NIM of the TM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicTemporomandibular Joint DisordersFrench-language works237,207