MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4381848985 · doi:10.1002/9781119866923.ch4

Value‐Added Processing of Lentils and Emerging Research Trends

2023· other· en· W4381848985 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Siddiq, C. Oduro-Yeboah, George Ooko Abong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood processingBusinessBiotechnologyFood technologyFood industrySustainabilityValue addedValue (mathematics)Production (economics)Food scienceMathematicsEconomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter presents an overview of lentil processing methods, lentil-based products/ingredients, and innovative technologies used for lentil processing. Some innovative technologies have emerged as an alternative to traditional thermal processing, which can also be employed in value-added processing of legumes, especially their nutritional and sensory qualities. Fermentation is a cost-effective process that can be used to improve the nutritional and functional quality of lentils. Lentils being rich in proteins and many bioactive compounds are well suited for producing a range of value-added products and functional foods. Development and commercial production of lentil ingredients can not only offer healthy food options to consumers but economic benefits to the food industry and lentil growers as well. Lentils offer a great potential to be incorporated into gluten-free and plant-based food products, which align well with changing consumer preferences for healthier foods that are produced in environmentally sustainable manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFood composition and properties→French-language works237,207→