MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381849082 · doi:10.1111/jfpe.14401

Real‐time detection of Fusarium infection in moving corn grains using <scp>YOLOv5</scp> object detection algorithm

2023· article· en· W4381849082 on OpenAlexafffund
Rathna Priya Thangaraj Sundaramurthy, Yogameena Balasubramanian, Annamalai Manickavasagan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Process Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFusariumObject detectionIntersection (aeronautics)Artificial intelligenceKernel (algebra)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsComputer scienceBiologyHorticultureCombinatoricsCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Real‐time inspection and removal of individual Fusarium head blight (FHB) infected corn grains from the processing lines has been a challenging issue due to the bulk handling and smaller kernel size. In this study, four different variants (small(s), medium(m), nano(n), and large(l)) of You Only Look Once (YOLO) version 5 object detection technique were trained for the detection of Fusarium infection in a moving monolayer of touching and non‐touching corn grains. The YOLOv5 object detection models were evaluated for their performance in detecting FHB infection in individual corn grains. A heterogeneous dataset containing images and video frames of healthy and FHB infected corn grains in different illuminations was utilized. The mean average precision calculated at Intersection over Union threshold of .5 (mAP@50) was 99%, 98%, 95%, and 96% for YOLOv5‐s, YOLOv5‐m, YOLOv5‐n, and YOLOv5‐l models, respectively. The detection speed in videos was 3.9, 1.6, 9.8, and .8 frames per second for YOLOv5‐s, m, n, and l models, respectively. For non‐touching grains, all four variants of the YOLOv5 model showed 100% precision, but for touching grains, all variants showed false negatives in detection of FHB infection, especially on overlapping kernels. The recall values were found to be 98%, 99%, 96%, and 97% for YOLOv5‐s, m, n, and l models, respectively. The best combination of mAP, detection speed, and lower false negatives was achieved by the YOLOv5‐m model. YOLOv5‐m has the potential for use in real‐time detection of Fusarium infection in corn grains apart from lag time in videos. Practical Application The developed video analysis technique based on YOLOv5 object detection method will be beneficial for the accurate identification of Fusarium infected corn grains in bulk handling facilities. The individual FHB infected grains could be detected on processing lines and could be used for real‐time inspection replacing the random sampling techniques currently used, thereby preventing the entry of Fusarium mycotoxins in the food chain. For non touching corn grains, all the YOLOv5 model variants showed a 100% precision in identifying the healthy and FHB infected grains. For touching grains, YOLOv5‐m model showed the best combination of mAP, detection speed, and lower false negatives proving appropriate for inspection on moving conveyor belts. The nano model with the lightweight architecture installed in portable devices can be used for immediate detection of FHB infection without lag time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food Process EngineeringSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207