Preharvest Quality Management, Postharvest Handling, and Consumption Trends of Lentils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of lentil preharvest quality management, postharvest handling/storage, and postharvest quantitative and qualitative losses, quality grading and standards, consumption trends, and role in food security. Maintenance of lentil quality during postharvest handling and storage is critical for its economic value and marketing and the consumer acceptance of raw lentils and lentil-based processed products. Most legume crops require a careful handling and proper postharvest storage before marketing/consumption. The most important factors of grain quality during postharvest storage are moisture level, storage temperature, and equilibrium relative humidity. The use of polypropylene bags with adequate moisture barrier is recommended for lentils packaging and shipping. The use of appropriate handling and storage practices is essential for quality preservation of lentils and reducing the quantitative and qualitative losses during postharvest storage and transportation. The emerging consumer preferences and trends are aligned well for expanding utilization of lentils as an important legume crop.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".