MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381852702 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2023.06.418

2023 CCS/CSE Standards for Physician Training and Maintenance of Competence in Adult Echocardiography: Executive Summary

2023· article· en· W4381852702 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Parvathy Nair, Annabel Chen‐Tournoux, Aws Almufleh, Sarah Blissett, Robin Ducas, Nowell M. Fine, Amer M. Johri, Dominique Kushneriuk, Sarah Ramer, Anthony Sanfilippo, Nicolas Thibodeau-Jarry, Eric Yu, David Bewick, Ian G. Burwash, Chi-Ming Chow, Heather Cooley, Sabe De, Ghislaine Douflé, Susan Fagan, Christine Henri, Davinder S. Jassal, Tomislav Jelić, Dana Lee, Jonathon Leipsic, Howard Leong‐Poi, Warren Luksun, Andrew Mulloy, Sharon L. Mulvagh, Gillian C. Nesbitt, Steven Promislow, Igal A. Sebag, Diem Tran, Teresa S.M. Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoMemorial University of NewfoundlandFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaSaint John Regional HospitalUniversity of OttawaDalhousie UniversityUniversité de MontréalQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversity of SaskatchewanSt. Paul's HospitalWestern UniversityRoyal University HospitalMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity Health NetworkLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaSt. Michael's HospitalAlberta Health ServicesJewish General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryVancouver General HospitalMcGill UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreQueen's UniversitySurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCompetence (human resources)ScopusAccreditationMedical educationCardiologyInternal medicineManagementMEDLINELaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Echocardiography is an imaging modality essential to the provision of contemporary cardiovascular care. Since the publication of the 2010 CCS/CSE Guidelines, 1 Burwash IG, Basmadjian A, Bewick D, Choy JB, Cujec B, Jassal DS, MacKenzie S, Nair P, Rudski L, Yu E, Tam JW. 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Echocardiography Guidelines for Training and Maintenance of Competency in Adult Echocardiography. Can J Cardiol 2010;27:862-864. Google Scholar clinical echocardiography has expanded with respect to both technologies and applications. At the same time there has been a shift in emphasis away from quantity of training (duration and case volumes) to actual demonstration of competency to determine successful completion of training. 2 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada “Competency by Design: Reshaping Medical Education” 2014 https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/educational-strategy-accreditation/royal-college-competency-by- design-ebook-e.pdf Accessed 8 March 2023. Google Scholar Concurrently, there is growing evidence of considerable variability in echocardiography competence among general cardiology trainees. 3 Nair P. Siu S.C. Sloggett C.E. Biclar L. Sidhu R.S. Yu E.H.C. The assessment of technical and interpretative proficiency in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006; 19: 924-931 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar , 4 Bierowski M.J. Qureshi U. Ramedani S. Grewal S. Shah R. Park B. Peterson B.R. Variable exposure to echocardiography core competencies when applying minimum recommended procedural numbers of cardiology fellows in training. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2022; 20: 24-32 Crossref Scopus (0) Google Scholar , 5 Yu C.C.W. Pendrith C. Chun S. Echocardiographic interpretation skills of graduating cardiology trainees. Can J Cardiol. 2022; 38: 1304-1306 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.075
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.145
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0750.145
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0110.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0190.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207