MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381852794 · doi:10.4324/9781003443926-1

Power Relations, North and South

2023· book-chapter· en· W4381852794 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paula J. Mellom, Socorro Herrera

Bibliographic record

VenueCrossing boundaries · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Conflict and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)GeographyPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problematized server-served relationship becomes particularly salient when the service site is a developing country in the “South” and those traveling to serve are from the “North”. The challenge for leaders of service-learning programs, especially in international programs where privileged students from the North are serving in peripheral communities in the South, is to cast light on the differences in social and cultural paradigms working through the “server’s” unrealistic romantic notions and hostility toward the “served,” based on rejection and ethnocentric judgments of the “Other,” and to move gently through reflection, discussion, and growing awareness to a posture of social justice. International service-learning programs such as those analyzed in this chapter may be a key way to tease out the server-served dichotomy as the borders between South and North become ever more blurred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.020
Scholarly communication0.0150.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrossing boundariesSame topicPolitical Conflict and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207