MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sunstone: A Scalable and Versatile Scheduler for Mapping Tensor Algebra on Spatial Accelerators

2023· article· en· W4381886109 on OpenAlexaff
MohammadHossein Olyaiy, Christopher Ng, Alexandra Fedorova, Mieszko Lis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDataflowComputer scienceScalabilityReuseTensor (intrinsic definition)Parallel computingDesign space explorationDataflow architectureStream processingComputer architectureTensor algebraComputationComputer engineeringComputational scienceEmbedded systemProgramming languageAlgebra over a fieldMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tensor algebra, the main component of several popular machine learning techniques, benefits from modern accelerators due to the massive parallelism and data reuse available. To achieve the benefits, however, optimizing the dataflow is crucial: prior works showed that 19×energy savings are possible by tuning the dataflow. This optimization is challenging because: (1) the optimization space for modern chip architectures with several levels of memory and multiple levels of spatial processing is vast, and (2) distinct tensor computations follow different memory access and reuse patterns. In this manuscript, we algebraically analyze the possible reuse when executing tensor workloads on an accelerator. Based on our analysis, we develop several principles that significantly reduce the dataflow optimization space even for modern, complex chip architectures. Moreover, these principles are transferable to various tensor workloads with different memory access patterns. Compared to prior work, our techniques can find dataflow for typical tensor workloads up to 800×faster and with up to 1.9×better energy-delay products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207