MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381889712 · doi:10.1101/2023.06.20.545793

SMART: reference-free deconvolution for spatial transcriptomics using marker-gene-assisted topic models

2023· preprint· en· W4381889712 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Xi Yang, DD Sin, RT Ng

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Identification (biology)Living cellComputational biologyCell typeArtificial intelligenceData miningPattern recognition (psychology)BiologyCellAlgorithmBiological systemGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Spatial transcriptomics (ST) offers valuable insights into gene expression patterns within the spatial context of tissue. However, most technologies do not have a single-cell resolution, masking the signal of the individual cell types. Here, we present SMART, a reference-free deconvolution method that simultaneously infers the cell type-specific gene expression profile and the cellular composition at each spot. Unlike most existing methods that rely on having a single-cell RNA-sequencing dataset as the reference, SMART only uses marker gene symbols as the prior knowledge to guide the deconvolution process and outperforms the existing methods in realistic settings when an ideal reference dataset is unavailable. SMART also provides a two-stage approach to enhance its performance on cell subtypes. Allowing the inclusion of covariates, SMART provides condition-specific estimates and enables the identification of cell type-specific differentially expressed genes across conditions, which elucidates biological changes at a single-cell-type resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207