MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381894494 · doi:10.1109/ismvl57333.2023.00047

Discovering Emerging Applications of Multi-Valued Logic: Protocols for Human-Autonomy Teaming

2023· article· en· W4381894494 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Shmerko, Svetlana Yanushkevich, Marek Perkowski, Yumi Iwashita, Adrian Stoica

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceEncoding (memory)AutonomySituation awarenessEmergency managementKnowledge managementComputer securityDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discovers an emerging area of application of the advanced Multivalued Logic (MVL), – a collaboration between humans and autonomous machines in the first responder teams (firefighters, search-and-rescue operators, disaster response personnel, and military special operations forces). We developed an approach to formalization of the collaboration protocols (also known as contagion protocols) that model the human-machine teaming in emergency missions. MVL techniques satisfy the requirements of encoding the states of stress and trust, and their propagation between the teammates. Advanced MVL techniques are also useful for other applications, such as modeling the contagion of infection, or the spread of rumors, ideas, panic, and fear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.011
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207