MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381896143 · doi:10.1353/ajh.2022.a899294

Immigration, Ideology, and Public Activity from an American Jewish Perspective: A Journey Across Three Continents by Zohar Segev (review)

2022· article· en· W4381896143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Jewish history · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudaismThe HolocaustAntisemitismImmigrationIdeologyHebrewLawZionismWorld War IIAnti-ZionismSociologyHistoryJewish studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsClassicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Immigration, Ideology, and Public Activity from an American Jewish Perspective: A Journey Across Three Continents by Zohar Segev Michael Keren (bio) Immigration, Ideology, and Public Activity from an American Jewish Perspective: A Journey Across Three Continents. By Zohar Segev. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2022. x + 233 pp. One of the hardest questions related to the Holocaust concerns the failure of Jewish organizations in the United States to persuade the American government to rescue European Jews by the bombardment of Auschwitz or by any other means. In order to understand that failure, it is useful to look at the persuasion efforts made at the time by American Jewish leaders as well as by second level officials within American Jewish organizations. Zohar Segev's book is based on the personal archives of four Europeanborn Jews who found refuge in the United States during the Second World War and held several positions in American Jewish organizations. Arieh Tartakover, an historian and sociologist who later taught at the Hebrew University, chaired the World Jewish Congress's Welfare and Relief Committee; Arieh Kubovy, later an Israeli diplomat and head of Yad Va'shem, chaired the World Jewish Congress's Rescue Committee based in New York; Benjamin Akzin, a jurist who later taught at the Hebrew University, was a consultant to the American Zionist Emergency Council in Washington; and Jacob Robinson, a lawyer and researcher, founded the Institute of Jewish Affairs, the research arm of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress. The experience of individuals who operated within the American Jewish organizational network in the 1940s seems an invaluable source for an exploration of the political, administrative and cultural causes behind the successes and failures of that network to rescue Jews during the Holocaust. Since the author has decided, however, that this question [End Page 418] is beyond the scope of his study, we are left with a description of activities conducted by the four men, mainly letters they wrote, which in themselves had no impact on the outcome of the war. Some of the letters are quite instructive though, if only because of the responses they elicited. Consider the responses Kubovy received to letters he wrote to Assistant Secretary of War John J. McCloy. In August 9, 1944, he conveyed a request from a Jewish activist in Czechoslovakia to bomb Auschwitz and the railway lines leading to it, which McCloy rejected on the grounds that such actions would require the use of significant air power and might not be effective. He also made the incredible claim that the bombardment could lead the Germans to institute even stricter measures against the Jews. When a few weeks later Kubovy sent McCloy another letter calling not for aerial bombing but for destruction of the death camp by paratroopers, the response was striking in its bureaucratic language. The assistant secretary informed Kubovy that the operations he suggested fell within the jurisdiction of the Allied Mediterranean Commander, who had been fully informed of the situation in the death camp areas. McCloy added that he was sure the theater commander "would do anything he felt he could to check these ghastly excesses of the Nazis" (87). One wonders why this dismissive response led Segev to conclude that it reflects serious consideration of the matter by government officials in Washington and American military leaders. The author is aware of the enormous frustration the four men felt as a result of the ineffectiveness of the rescue efforts they took part in. However, with some exceptions, such as Kubovy's criticism of Stephen Wise, president of the World Jewish Congress, we are given few clues as to their attitudes toward the top Jewish leadership, a matter which, once again, is claimed to be beyond the scope of this study. The book thus makes a contribution by bringing to light documents by four refugee immigrants who worked in American Jewish organizations during the 1940s and played an active role in the Zionist movement before and after the establishment of the State of Israel, but the documents are still awaiting an analysis within a broader scope. [End Page 419] Michael Keren University of Calgary and Western Galilee Academic College Michael Keren...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it