MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381929204 · doi:10.33552/sjrr.2023.03.000570

Youth and Down Syndrome: A Canadian Practice of Inclusion, Communication and Creative Arts

2023· article· en· W4381929204 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lynn Le Vatte

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Journal of Research & Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsInclusion (mineral)DanceAction researchVisual artsPsychologyConversationAction (physics)Creative writingQualitative researchPedagogySociologyArtSocial psychologyCommunicationSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Participant Action Research Project (PAR) was a collaborative & qualitative research project which explored creative and visual arts as a method for social inclusion and communication. Six youth with Down syndrome (DS) from Nova Scotia were participants. This active participation within a creative and visual arts modality explored and share individual experiences from participation in a social inclusion project during the COVID- 19 lockdown period. Youth experienced community song writing, creative dance, photo collage, and photo voice sessions as a mode of expressive communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.154
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1540.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.711
GPT teacher head0.681
Teacher spread0.031 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Journal of Research & ReviewsSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207